So my first submission was based on portraits.
For part two we had the same options again, portraits, landscapes, still life and so on…….
I don’t like labels and am aware that the gig photography or portraits are my stronger areas.
Although portraiture was a complete accident and a total surprise to me that I enjoy it.
Anyway, I wanted to move away from these areas and try something a little different. I also wanted to really challenge myself to learn about lighting.
So we are in class and the teacher asks people what they want to do. So far he hasn’t really questioned anyones decisions and then he gets to me.
“How about you Jim, what are you thinking of doing?”
Really I want to do a mix of things, I am happy with my first submission and confident that whatever I pick, if I screw it up, the first images would be strong enough to at least guarantee a pass grade.
Being me (Apparently a typical Aries…If you believe in that stuff) I don’t want to do one thing…. My reply was more of a question; because with tutor approval you can step outside of the suggested genres.
“Can I do some landscape/cityscapes, portraits and still life?”
The poor teacher has had to put up with me for two terms and I can see him thinking to himself ‘where is he going with this’. He asks me how I plan on tying the different images together.
I suggest ‘Film Noir’. I get a smirk from the lecturer who says “Go on then, lets see what you can do”.
Instantly I think I have made a huge mistake. But I have to say I loved this project so much and had a massive learning cure. Not only technically with the camera and lights but with UK firearms regulations, having to be creative and getting organised.
Due to time constrains I was unable to complete all the images I had planned. I was finding it difficult to find particular props and rather than rigidly sticking to the 1940s and 50s film noir props I had to improvise and settle for the overall mood and feel of those classic movies.
Due to the time of year I was unable to arrange for friends to get city scape shots. Yes cityscapes don’t need people but this is Film Noir, I need shadows, silhouettes and so on. I guess I could have taken some without people and they would have added an element of suspense and danger but I had my plans…… So the long days and light evenings defeated me with regards to that aspect of the planned cityscape submissions.
Budget also played a big factor. I would love to have time and a budget suitable to tackle this project again.
One or two of the still life images may have been posted earlier; prior to making my final submission. Some of the images didn’t make it into the final submission because I wasn’t happy with them or I had stronger images.
As with my portrait post I am going to post two examples of the work produced:
The image above did not make it in to the final body of work. I do like it and think it has all the right touches of Le Femme Fatale from the era. The silhouette of legs going up the stairs only add some mystery and intrigue to the image.
I was torn between this and another image, my C&G photography peers helped me select a couple of images.
You can see the stronger image that was chosen from this shoot on my flickr page.
As you can see from image one and two (Along with other images taken in the series) lighting was an important element for the project. I learned a huge amount and feel like I have only just scratched the surface of how to sculpt an image with light.
I hope you like these enough to visit flickr and see the other images.
If you are wondering what grades I got; it was a distinction for submission one and…….. distinction for submission two.
I’m not really sure how the grades work to be honest. I have seen some people call it a ‘double distinction’ but I think the overall grade is just a distinction. Thats good enough for me.
One last thank you to everyone that modelled & provided props. Without you it would not have gone so well. Thanks also to everyone that provided feed back and encouragement. Especially Mrs.M. PJ. & my working photographer friends, Teacher & Classmates whose blogs and work and be found by clicking the links: PJ, Caz, Seb, Ian, Tim, Matt, Hannah, Paul & Sara.
As always, thanks for looking. Constructive feed back and your thoughts on my photographs are welcome.
Jim Jimmy James
I think your Film Noir effort was first-rate Jim. The props were very good, the models looked the part, and the mood lighting came across very well. I have looked at all the shots on Flickr, and I really think you should congratulate yourself for coming a long way in the ‘Art.’
Best wishes, Pete.
Too kind Pete.
Thanks for the mention! I remember the day you told me you were having trouble getting hold of a gun. Having forgotten your subject matter I was a bit concerned…! I guess we’ll find out how the grades work when our certificates arrive but my guess is it’s probably just one overall grade. Congrats on the distinction!
I’ll not be going down the firearms route again. Far too demanding. Although I think Film Noir is a project I’d like to visit again. Loved the challenge of it.
Wow, what stylish photos.
Thats very kind of you Vinnieh.
As a film lover what is your favourite film noir movie?
Double Indemnity is great, and if you’re counting neo noir L.A. Confidential.
I’m thinking about another film noir project so will watch both of those for some inspiration. Thanks for taking the time to comment. Jim.
Oh they’re both great examples of noir. I await your photos with anticipation.