If you have perused through my photography diary blog thing… I really don’t know if its a blog or a diary or what it I should really refer to it as.
Anyhow, if you’ve had a look at my pages you may have come across a couple of posts asking about art and photography.
I find it hard to get my head around some aspects of photography being referred to as art, yet some photography is clearly artistic and some great efforts go into setting up and capturing some photographic scenes.
Photography takes knowledge, skill, vision and a varying degree of imagination so the photographer should receive commensurate praise and reward as any other artistic medium.
But then what is art?
Its easy for some to scoff this kind of work but what are they scoffing at, the artist or the art world?
I know what I thought at the time and to be honest I wasn’t impressed but then it wasn’t and still isn’t a world I am immersed in.
I feel differently about such exhibits now and think actually it was very brave to put such a personal thing on display to the public, after all it wasn’t just an unmade bed unlike my photos I am about to show.
I think what confuses me is the part of who decides something is art and who decides what its value is?
So without wanting to sound like I am mocking the artists or the curators and supporters of art, can you, should you ever stumble across this post, tell me something…
Is the art in the unconscious state of sleep, the semi-wakened state of removing bedding to get out of bed, perhaps my decisions on composition and processing the images or even all of these in combination.
If I was to print these where would I suggest they are hung?
How much would I even consider charging for them?
Perhaps they are of no value because I am me; just a run of the mill normal bloke not selling myself as an artist?
I really aint being condescending, thats not who I am. Just very simply, if you are into art, are arty, an artist or just have an opinion, please fill in the gaps for me.
Jim Jimmy James